Are you sure ?
Having received the two following comments in quick succession, I thought I would set out how things occurred, and nearly did.
But first of all I would ask these two individuals, if they are still members, or know the former Hon Secretary, have you asked him for his views of the position the Society was in during his short term in office..
Failing that let me know who you are and maybe I'll give you the facts privately and personally.
Your statement is not really true as your 'coup' comment named several ex committee members and made derogatory remarks about them. To my knowledge none of those named have attacked you Fred and therefore you had no reason to attack them. Furthermore several of those mentioned served the BS for 10yrs+ and actually did an awful lot of hard work for the membership. Perhaps you should have remembered that before publicly slating them! on Confidence broken part 2
Anonymous
on 30/01/13
I have to say, whoever you are, your knowledge is incomplete, at least two of them certainly did.
One on the BS forum and on a little used blog of his, and another set up an email in my name and wrote to people, but he was soon found out.
I would also ask how do you know, or who told you they did an awful lot of hard work ?
One on the BS forum and on a little used blog of his, and another set up an email in my name and wrote to people, but he was soon found out.
I would also ask how do you know, or who told you they did an awful lot of hard work ?
Fred, am I right in saying that all of the people you name who alledgedly tried to de-throne Mr Pope then left the BS Committee shortly after he refused to step aside? Is it just coincidence then that the BS has steadily declined since then in terms of member numbers, loss of fisheries, less magazines, no junior days etc etc.? Perhaps you under estimate the work they did put in! FM onThe Story
Anonymous
on 30/01/13
No allegedly about it. He didn't refuse to step down, he noted he was still wanted on the committee, the vote showed him that.
The trouble was that all "the work they did put in" was only showing on the surface, there is evidence that numbers appeared to be in decline since 2002 at the latest, and I can tell you how if you have the common decency to declare your interest. I'm not certain if 2002 has any significance, I'll check that out though.
I can tell you at the very least, without going into detail here, that there were serious member management problems when I joined the committee in 2008.
So an awful lot of "hard work" wasn't as effective as we were all lead to believe!
Today with the current committee, there are no problems with management, just problems to overcome with the individual members and potential new members priorities with their finances.
Up date
2002 the year the Society started up it's own Forum....... now I wonder?
Up date
2002 the year the Society started up it's own Forum....... now I wonder?